The Works of Lord Byron. Vol. 6 — Story, Setting & Ideas
Edition facts
The source record for The Works of Lord Byron. Vol. 6 — Story, Setting & Ideas measures this digital text at 191,303 words, 13 hr 52 min estimated reading time, and 39 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 24.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “English poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
yron was a rapid as well as a voluminous writer. His _Tales_ were thrown off at lightning speed, and even his dramas were thought out and worked through with unhesitating energy and rapid achievement. Nevertheless, the composition of his two great poems was all but coextensive with his poetical life. He began the first canto of _Childe Harold_ in the autumn of 1809, and he did not complete the fourth canto till the spring of 1818. He began the first canto of _Don Juan_ in the autumn of 1818, and he was still at work on a seventeenth canto in the spring of 1823. Both poems were issued in parts, and with long intervals of unequal duration between the parts; but the same result was brought about by different causes and produced a dissimilar effect. _Childe Harold_ consists of three distinct poems descriptive of three successive travels or journeys in foreign lands. The adventures of the hero are but the pretext for the shifting of the diorama; whereas in _Don Juan_ the story is continuous, and the scenery is exhibited as a background for the dramatic evolution of the personality of the hero. _Childe Harold_ came out at intervals, because there were periods when the author was stationary; but the interruptions in the composition and publication of _Don Juan_ were due to the disapproval and discouragement of friends, and the very natural hesitation and procrastination of the publisher. Canto I. was written in September, 1818; Canto II. in December-January, 1818-1819. Both cantos were published on July 15, 1819. Cantos III., IV. were written in the winter of 1819-1820; Canto V., after an interval of nine months, in October-November, 1820, but the publication of Cantos III., IV., V. was delayed till August 8, 1821. The next interval was longer still, but it was the last. In June, 1822, Byron began to work at a sixth, and by the end of March, 1823, he had completed a sixteenth canto. But the publication of these later cantos, which had been declined by Murray, and were finally entrusted to John Hunt, was spread over a period of several months. Cantos VI., VII., VIII., with a Preface, were published July 15; Cantos IX., X., XI, August 29; Cantos XII., XIII., XIV., December 17, 1823; and, finally, Cantos XV., XVI., March 26, 1824. The composition of _Don Juan_, considered as a whole, synchronized with the composition of all the dramas (except _Manfred_) and the following poems: _The Prophecy of Dante_, (the translation of) _The Morgante Maggiore, The Vision of Judgment, The Age of Bronze_, and _The Island_.
There is little to be said with regard to the "Sources" of _Don Juan_. Frere's _Whistlecraft_ had suggested _Beppo_, and, at the same time, had prompted and provoked a sympathetic study of Frere's Italian models, Berni and Pulci (see "Introduction to _Beppo_," _Poetical Works_, 1901, iv. 155-158; and "Introduction to _The Morgante Maggiore_" ibid., pp. 279-281); and, again, the success of _Beppo_, and, still more, a sense of inspiration and the conviction that he had found the path to excellence, suggested another essay of the _ottava rima_, a humorous poem "_à la Beppo_" on a larger and more important scale. If Byron possessed more than a superficial knowledge of the legendary "Don Juan," he was irresponsive and unimpressed. He speaks (letter to Murray, February 16, 1821) of "the Spanish tradition;" but there is nothing to show that he had read or heard of Tirso de Molina's (Gabriel Tellez) _El Burlador de Sevilla y Convidado de Piedra_ (_The Deceiver of Seville and the Stone Guest_), 1626, which dramatized the "ower true tale" of the actual Don Juan Tenorio; or that he was acquainted with any of the Italian (e.g. _Convitato di Pietra_, del Dottor Giacinto Andrea Cicognini, Fiorentino [see L. Allacci _Dramaturgia_, 1755, 4º, p. 862]) or French adaptations of the legend (_e.g_. _Le Festin de Pierre, ou le fils criminel_, Tragi-comédie de De Villiers, 1659; and Molière's _Dom Juan, ou Le Festin de Pierre_, 1665). He had seen (_vide post_, p. 11, note 2) Delpini's pantomime, which was based on Shadwell's _Libertine_, and he may have witnessed, at Milan or Venice, a performance of Mozart's _Don Giovanni_; but in taking Don Juan for his "hero," he took the name only, and disregarded the "terrible figure" "of the Titan of embodied evil, the likeness of sin made flesh" (see _Selections from the Works of Lord Byron_, by A.C. Swinburne, 1885, p. xxvi.), "as something to his purpose nothing"!
This sixth volume of the new, revised edition of Lord Byron's works centers on Don Juan, presenting the poem with an editorial apparatus that draws directly on original manuscripts. The editor, Ernest Hartley Coleridge, has collated texts in the possession of Lady Dorchester and Mr. John Murray, and includes for the first time a fragment of a Seventeenth Canto, consisting of fourteen stanzas. The volume's footnotes are layered: those in square brackets are Coleridge's own, while unbracketed notes derive from earlier editions or from Byron himself. A system of lettered footnotes documents variant forms from manuscripts and other sources, allowing the reader to trace the poem's evolution.
The Editor's Documentary Method
Coleridge's preface makes clear that this edition is built on direct consultation of original authorities. He has not only collated but in many instances retranscribed the quotations from Sir G. Dalzell's Shipwrecks and Disasters at Sea (1812) and from the Marquis Gabriel de Castelnau's Essai sur l'Histoire Ancienne et Moderne de la Nouvelle Russie (1827). These sources were first included in the notes to the fifteenth and sixteenth volumes of the 1833 edition and have been reprinted in subsequent issues. The editor's attention to the physical page is evident: page numbers from the original 1903 printing are preserved as bracketed marginal numbers and as HTML anchors, enabling precise cross-referencing with the footnotes, which are collected at the ends of each preface or Canto and numbered consecutively.
Stanza Structure and the Siege of Ismail
The excerpt from Canto VII (stanzas XXIII–XXXIV) illustrates Byron's characteristic ottava rima: eight lines of iambic pentameter with a rhyme scheme of abababcc. The narrative describes the Russian bombardment of Ismail, mixing technical military detail with sardonic commentary. Stanza XXIII notes that the city's shape—'Formed like an amphitheatre'—made each dwelling a target. Byron undercuts heroic expectations by listing three motives for the attack: to bombard, to profit by consternation, and 'to frighten them into capitulation,' adding that this last is 'A phantasy which sometimes seizes warriors, / Unless they are game as bull-dogs and fox-terriers.' The stanza's closing couplet often delivers a deflating or humorous turn.
Recurring Images: Miscalculation and Chance
Byron repeatedly emphasizes the role of error and luck in warfare. In stanza XXVI, the Russian batteries are incomplete 'because they were constructed in a hurry,' a cause that 'makes a verse want feet' and affects book sales. The comparison links poetic composition to military engineering, both subject to haste. Stanza XXVIII describes a 'sad miscalculation about distance' that causes fireships to blow up prematurely 'in the middle of the river' while the Turks sleep. The word 'miscalculation' recurs, and the narrative dwells on failed plans: the batteries 'either missed, or they were never missed.' Fame itself is presented as arbitrary—'Renown's all hit or miss' (stanza XXXIII)—and the historian quoted in stanza XXXII admits he could fill volumes but says no more.
Movement Between Scenes: From Battle to Reflection
The passage shifts fluidly between panoramic battle description and reflective commentary. Stanzas XXIII–XXIX detail the Russian advance and the Turkish response, with precise times ('At seven they rose,' 'T was nine') and a six-hour cannonade. Then, in stanza XXXI, the focus narrows to a specific action: the Moslem Delhis man boats and attempt a landing, only to be driven back by Count Damas 'with a whole gazette of slaughter.' The phrase 'gazette of slaughter' compresses the official report into a wry image. Immediately after, the narrator steps back to question fame, introducing the Prince de Ligne, Langeron, and Damas as names 'great as any that the roll of Fame has,' yet unknown to common readers. This movement from concrete event to abstract meditation is a recurring structural pattern in the poem.
Readers approaching this volume will find that the editorial apparatus—particularly the footnotes documenting variant readings and sources—offers a window into Byron's compositional process. The newly published fragment of Canto XVII, though brief, hints at the poem's unfinished trajectory. The collation with original manuscripts means that the text here is as close as possible to Byron's own revisions. For those interested in the interplay between the poem's satirical voice and its historical grounding, the notes on Dalzell and Castelnau provide a concrete basis for Byron's borrowings and transformations.
There’s something about digging through Byron’s scattered notes and variant lines that feels less like scholarship and more like sitting beside a friend who left unfinished thoughts everywhere. I found myself thinking of that same quiet patience when I later wandered through The Children's Longfellow Told in Prose — Context and Discussion. Both left me holding fragments gently, not needing them whole. A soft, lingering company.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Take a moment to reflect on this book
Create a short personal record of your experience with this book.